Novels Template‑class | |||||||
|
Why no stone spring? section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.166.224.5 ( talk) 14:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Holy giganti-template! Can't this be shrunk down a bit? There's a lot of empty space, and I don't see a need for the footnotes inside the infobox... save that information for the book's article. - Motor ( talk) 16:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I've just updated the template with a more compact format. It's just a suggestion, feel free to modify it, or even revert it if you wish. I just copied the data across into the more compact table unmodified... but IMO, it needs a few things removing: the "year in literature" links, the books that haven't been published yet, and the footnotes within the templates. - Motor ( talk) 21:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions, they make it a lot easier to read. However I was wondering would it be acceptable to remove the italics because the writing is small and italics make the text hard to read. Just thought it might be a violation of some policy/rule in Wikipedia being as I am refering to the book as a book. Thanks again. Lcarsdata Talk | @ | Contribs 18:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Will this template needs so frequent updating/correcting as to require an edit link? Circeus 16:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
The title for the 'A Time Odyssey' series was misspelled as 'A Time Odesy'. Now corrected. 131.170.90.4 00:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)chaos95
The template is meant to be a complete list of all of Stephen Baxter's published books, the fact that some of these don't have articles is an internal Wikipedia thing, but is not a reason to comment them out of the list.
If no one objects I will restore them to visibility in a couple of days. Lcarsdata Talk | @ | Contribs 10:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)