This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wikipedia Help This template is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp articles Usability This template is within the scope of WikiProject Usability, a group of editors promoting application of web and user-interface usability best practices in the presentation of Wikipedia content. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.UsabilityWikipedia:WikiProject UsabilityTemplate:WikiProject UsabilityUsability articles

Template:Simple help page editnotice is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{ edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Help Project#New editnotice to help fight WP:CREEP. {{u| Sdkb}}  ^talk 04:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

See the sandbox diff for the changes that I request be made. It rewords the warning to be more clear and straightforward. waddie96 ★ ( talk) 10:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hmm. Editor waddie96, it appears that keeping the "to avoid instruction creep" up front is more clear and grammatically correct. So sorry, but I have to oppose this change. See no use for the comma after the phrase, though. Maybe that's just me? P.I. Ellsworth ,  ed.  ^{put'er there}  16:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I think the proposed wording is good. I support this change. (Though nixing the comma in pages, to.) SWinxy ( talk) 18:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Okay, that's agreeable, it was that comma that threw me, definitely should be no comma in pages, to. P.I. Ellsworth ,  ed.  ^{put'er there}  18:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth ,  ed.  ^{put'er there}  18:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply