This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
I created this template to tag Dutch
Rijksmonuments. I am not familiar with intricate coding so it is very simple. Usage is to {{Rijksmonument|Official monument number}}. It will generate a small box with the number and a reference to a registry. If anyone knows how to insert the official monument number inside the hyperlink please do. I have no idea how.
Great thanks, had some problems finding a better sources and this one is indeed better. Also the blue shield is nice addition.
Arnoutf (
talk)
17:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Allignment
This template needs some cleanup. As it is currently implemented, it places the box into the text areas. This would be better located under the infobox, if there is one. If you look at an article like
American Hotel, Amsterdam, the two infoboxes are placed next to each other making the article look tacky.
Vegaswikian (
talk)
22:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I'm not a style expert, but it seems like converting it to use the infobox style does exactly what you asked for, with two side effects. First, the text is slightly higher. Second, which might actually be beneficial, if two of these are used they will always be one below the other, not to the left. I implemented it in the sandbox, here's an example, note where the template shows and how:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
This template references the KICH website which is deprecated in favor of the monumentenregister voor cultureelerfgoed. I would change it, but I believe some of the numbers have changed as well.
Jane (
talk)
19:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)reply
I am not aware of any number changes, but the url's at
http://monumentenregister.cultureelerfgoed.nl/php/main.php seem pretty inhospitable. BTW, I am interested in creating an inline version of this template, which does not create a box (with the image), but which just generates a short link which can be placed anywhere in text, lists, etc.
Here's the odd thing. There are two IDs, the monument number, which is displayed, and the "object number" which is internal, but can be easily found from the URL. For some entries, these two numbers are the same, so you can search for 3403 and display 3403:
search and
display. For other entries, you may have a different object number, so
search 508167 but
display 1001849. In my opinion the best way to handle this is let the user decide what they want to do. So I added support for all options:
same ID
{{cite Monumentenregister|name=American Hotel|monumentID=3403|accessdate=6 February 2012}} produces:
Wow man, just, wow. I think this is perfect. How about I do some testing with an assortment of mon's, do some thinking and get back to you in 24hrs (kind of busy right now)?
Superp (
talk)
18:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)reply
in both the inline and the extended versions, write rijksmonument with a lowercase "r".
in the inline version, prefix the monument nr. with # (as part of the xlink's anchor). This because some nrs. might be mistaken for e.g. years, like
User:Muhandes/cite Monumentenregister
On a philosophical note, I'm flummoxed that organisations which control canonical identifiers like this don't create simple and permanent url's to look them up. WP:en, Commons, were all spending time reverse engineering. WP:nl even resorted to a
url-shortener (look for para.ms in the source). Regs,
Superp (
talk)
16:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Well, after going through two restructuring of the
USCG database and at least three of the
BVMI database, each requiring thousands of edits to fix, I guess I learned not to expect much. I made the correction you suggested and went public: {{Cite Monumentenregister}}, I hope you and other editors will find it useful. Let me know if anything else is needed. --
Muhandes (
talk)
09:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Thanks, I think it's pretty useful we can use the register as a reference. How did we get by without this? I have started to use it, no doubt others will follow.
Superp (
talk)
16:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)reply