This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 30 May 2017. The result of the discussion was disambiguate and make namespace-specific. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to nominate this redirect for RFD. May you please add {{ subst:rfd}} around the content then? George Ho ( talk) 04:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Just in case: [1]. George Ho ( talk) 04:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The outcome of the RfD discussion was that this template should transclude as {{ Di-no source}} in the file namespace and as {{ Citation needed}} in articles. But what should its behaviour be in other namespaces? I've set it up so that it will transclude {{ Citation needed}} everywhere but on files. This is because article text (which may contain this template) can generally be found all over the place: in drafts or user sandboxes, quoted in discussions or copied for reworking on article talk pages. If anyone has any thoughts, now is a good time to share them. Pinging participants in the discussion: George Ho, Godsy, Primefac, AngusWOOF, Tavix, Jo-Jo Eumerus, Rich Farmbrough, Secretlondon, Nyttend.
Also noting the template outputs somewhat cluttered wikicode when substed, which might be relevant for editors who subst their {{ cn}}s for automatic filling in of the date parameter. I hope this isn't going to be a frequent occurrence. – Uanfala 22:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)