This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Infoboxes This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles Food and drink: Cheeses This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Related taskforces: /  This template is supported by the Cheeses task force. Food and Drink task list: history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Some cheeses are made by only one manufacturer, and sometimes the cheese name is different from that of the maker. Would it be useful to have a field for the maker? ^Bongo _matic 01:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply

With so many different kinds of rennet substitutes (microbial, vegetable) shouldn't that be one of the infobox sections? Infoeco ( talk) 01:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Rather than specify the type of rennet (that may be too specific for an infobox), I would support adding a "vegetarian: yes/no" label. Conejero intl ( talk) 16:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC) reply

It's a fairly standard field and I'm wondering why it's not there. Lockesdonkey ( talk) 15:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Northamerica1000, Shkuru Afshar, and Hike395: Greetings and felicitations. I can see that it's been a while since some of you have edited this template, but all of you are still active on Wikipedia as of this month. Would someone please be so kind as to fix the pasteurised/pasteurized= parameter? The latter spelling works, but it gives the editing preview warning: "Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox Cheese with unknown parameter 'pasteurized'". I'm afraid I am too unfamiliar with the markup to make the necessary change(s). — DocWatson42 ( talk) 03:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC) reply

@ DocWatson42:Hi buddy.

Please review and give me a feedback.

Cheers Shkuru Afshar ( talk) 03:17, 10 June 2022 (UTC) reply

That works—thank you! ^_^ — DocWatson42 ( talk) 03:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC) reply

The Manual of Style says links to sister projects should be in the last section of article; why is there a link in infobox? GraemeLeggett ( talk) 18:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I think we could interpret the MOS to allow an interwiki link in the infobox. Certainly, WP:MOSSIS directs us to generally put IW links in the EL:

Sister project links should generally appear in the "External links" section, or where appropriate in citations.

In another place, the MOS discourages sister wikilinks in article body text itself to avoid confusion (although does not talk about infoboxes). From MOS:IWL:

To avoid reader confusion, inline interlanguage, or interwiki, linking within an article's body text is generally discouraged.

However, the content guidelines generally supports external links in infoboxes, e.g., from WP:EL#Important points to remember:

...include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable.

I think we need to reach a consensus about whether a Commons link in this infobox is net helpful for our users. If the consensus is "helpful", then I think we can use WP:EL to support the inclusion. If necessary, we can start a discussion at WT:SIS to allow IW links in infoboxes.

What do other editors think? Is the link helpful or not worth the space in the infobox? — hike395 ( talk) 03:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply