The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (September 2008) ( Learn how and when to remove this message)

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

‹ The template below ( WikiProject History) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › History This template is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Lebanon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles Phoenicia This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles

The contents of the Template:History of Lebanon (ancient) page were merged into Template:History of Lebanon on October 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

I'm hardly an expert on Lebanon, but I have to question some of the decisions made in this template. It looks like everything is written to a politically correct Maronite POV, down to listing "Arab Rule" as "Foreign." < eleland/ talk edits> 11:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

What would you like to call it? "Arabian rule"? A group of people from the Arabian peninsula invaded the area in the seventh century AD, and controlled it off and on for six hundred years (including two hundred years of attacks by the crusaders, who took control of some areas). Then the Mamluks took control for a few hundred years, and then the Ottoman empire conquered the area and held control until the end of World War I. I don't think the classification has anything to do with the more modern controversy of "Arabism vs. Phoenicianism", it's just a reflection of the group that ruled the area during that time period. ← George ^{[ talk} 07:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Arab rule was foreign, firstly Arabs aren't native to Lebanon, second, even if they had been, the Arabs who did rule weren't natives. FunkMonk ( talk) 10:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Could anyone put some code in here so the template won't botch out page layout and create massive white space? See Lebanese Civil War for example. FunkMonk ( talk) 10:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply