Template:GeoGroup is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
GeoGroup template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 93 days |
Geographical coordinates | ||||
|
Microformats | ||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2007 August 2. The result of the discussion was "Keep". |
I used the GeoGroup function back when I was sorting Category:Central Province, Sri Lanka geography stubs about a year ago. It was dandy. Now I'd like to use it in some stub categories under Category:Pakistan geography stubs, but when I try to apply {{ GeoGroup}} or {{ GeoGroupTemplate}} to a category (such as Category:Populated places in Upper Kohistan District), I'm taken to an OSM page that shows "sorry, no data to show". (I get the same result on the categories I previously used it on in Category:Central Province, Sri Lanka geography stubs.) I've tried varying the parameters per the template/doc, to no avail. Is there another setting I need to use, or has the OSM URL in the code changed? Please help. Her Pegship ( ?) 18:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
It times out with an error message starting with "Webservice request timed out". Initially it did it on an article with many coords, but further testings shows it is not working on any article no matter how few coords. Kerry ( talk) 01:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
I have been expanding articles on mountain ranges and major glaciers in Antarctica to include lists of smaller features such as mountains, cliffs and tributary glaciers. The idea is to get rid of trivial little stubs, and put the information they hold into the context of a larger feature. Worcester Range is an example. I usually remember to add {{ geogroup}}, which I find helpful to check for anomalies in the coordinates. But at first glance, what displays is just a scatter of pointers on a plain, pale blue background. The reader has to look very carefully to see there are some light grey regions where the mountains are. And they have to zoom in, zoom in further. and zoom in more to find a little red triangle where OpenStreetMap thinks the peak is, and zoom in further again to find the OpenStreetMap name.
Is there any way to add a parameter or parameters to {{ GeoGroup}} to ask for greater contrast and more prominent feature symbols and names? Aymatth2 ( talk) 14:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Clicking on the GeoGroup box in the rendered article isn't launching Open Street Map. However, Open Street Map itself seems to be working as normal. Not sure where to report this problem. Kerry ( talk) 02:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Stopped working again. After a long delay, I see "Wikimedia Toolforge Error: Our servers are currently experiencing a technical problem. This is probably temporary and should be fixed soon. Please try again later." Aymatth2 ( talk) 15:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
https://osm4wiki.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/wiki/wiki-osm.pl?project=en&article=Marcos_mansions§ion=List+of+current+%26+former+properties+owned+by+the+Marcos+clan
Initially I thought I must have made an error entering coordinates in the article I was working on, but it seems every GeoGroup I checked both in Australian articles and beyond is taking the reader to the same map of somewhere in Germany. Not sure if this is our problem or Open Street Maps. Kerry ( talk) 02:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)