This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Move?
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved.
Jenks24 (
talk) 14:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)reply
This template has had this name since it was created back in 2004. Moving a template's name causes a lot of unnecessary transclusion via a redirect since all of the articles that currently use this template would then be connected to this template via a redirect.
Steel1943 (
talk) 02:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Not an issue, especially w/ a template as rarely used as this one. Moving should be fine and should be done because the rationale is correct. --
The Evil IP address (
talk) 19:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak support Essentially unnecessary, but not harmful. --
BDD (
talk) 22:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Also I think
Hubert-Joseph Henry would be a worthwhile addition given his major role in the affair.
Dunarc (
talk) 15:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)reply
I have now added Hubert-Joseph Henry in as he is clearly important and would probably not be notable enough to have an article were not for his role in the case. However I have left Clemenceau for now as I think the case for his inclusion is more borderline.
Dunarc (
talk) 23:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)reply
