This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
I support the merger. Districts of Bristol looks like it is used to distinguish formal council districts - so Avonmouth is listed but Shirehampton isn't, because the latter is part of the former district. Personally I think that the areas template is more useful because of its completeness and because council district names are less commonly used than the actual names of the areas they refer to. Ask someone from Shirehampton if you doubt that! --
TimTay (
talk)
16:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, I would support a merger and then a cleanup. No-one refers to Clifton East, not many to Ashley. Perhaps a link on the city council article to their ward-finder.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
17:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree, they need merging, there's no point in having two separate templates. I started doing this over a year ago, but got sidetracked and forgot about it. A possible combined version is in
my sandbox. —
GasheadsteveTalk to me18:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I like the sandbox version. I'd be annoyed about losing the ward template as I spent a long time sorting every bristol image on commons by ward. -mattbuck (
Talk)
20:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)reply