This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
I moved the title from
Template:Cuisine of China to
Template:Chinese cuisine to make consistent with the article of
Chinese cuisine. I also changed the template's layout and colors along with the addition of missing entries, such as cooking methods, historical documents, food types, etc. I think this new change definitely reduces the unnecessary space and length that the previous version has. If you want to fix some grammatical errors or tweak to enhance the template, feel free to do so.--
Caspian blue 19:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Hello all, I just wanted to mention that this is a navigation template. Navigation templates provide a single formatted box that links together related articles but do not provide information about the subject; as such they do not need to be cited. If this were an information box, the information inside of it would need to be cited following the established rules for sources.
The current image,
File:ChineseDishLogo.png is unsatisfying and biased because it only includes traditional characters, writing 中國菜 instead of 中国菜. If we want to be neutral, then maybe we should write some alternative like 中餐 which is same in both versions, or stick to the language version of the area that is more populous, unquestionably authentic, and most recognizable.
Shrigley (
talk) 00:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Personally, I would like to strike the characters entirely, and from all at
Category:Cuisine templates by country. An image alone is enough, and sometimes too much, as it can be controversial like in the case of
Template:American cuisine, where it was removed.
When the text is unsatisfying and biased, we should remove the picture. It would have been nice when we had a picture of the dish without the text, but I couldn't find one. Although I acknowledge that "Chinese cuisine", just like "American cuisine" does not exist, I would suggest to use another picture. The one offered here seems neutral enough to me, although it just represents one kitchen out of a few hundred, I guess. The Bannertalk 09:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Sure. That's not a bad picture. It could be from anywhere, so it's not xxx-centric. Plus there's the dragon fruit -- very Chinese.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 09:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)reply
yes, we should just remove the image entirely per prior discussions about similar templates.
Frietjes (
talk) 22:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Getting rid of all the images would solve everything. Picking one image is like asking which fruit represents fruit. Try a Duck confit image at the French template and the Cassoulet people will freak. Blood pressure will rise (but that would probably be from the rich diet). So, sure. How about no image here for starters?
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 23:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Australian Chinese food
There needs to be a page on this and it should be added to the template/category. I might get around to it eventually but if someone else did it first, that would be super.
Sir Langan (
talk) 04:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)reply
The list of dishes seems to have been removed from the Italian cuisine infobox, so sorry, no.
Woshiyiweizhongguoren (
🇨🇳) 13:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The great traditions
The "Four Great Traditions" and the "Eight Great Traditions" are very well documented and known, but mind if I ask: where do the ten, twelve, fourteen, sixteen, and new eight great traditions come from, and why do they all need to be listed in this infobox? It's kind of redundant, if you ask me, really.
Are there any alternative ways of representation? I believe we can keep the four, the eight, and the sixteen, but what harm is there in removing everything in between? I'd like to hear of more opinions before making my desired changes myself.