 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Would appreciate help with the sorting (by province), and some identifiable colour scheme as well. Sherurcij ( Speaker for the Dead) 18:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Why color? 74.13.107.111 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- "Prettiness" wasn't a good enough reason? :Þ Sherurcij ( Speaker for the Dead) 00:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Why is this template called merely {{TrainingCamp}}? Surely other organization have
training camps? I found a training camp in
Snowdonia in Wales once -- run by and for some sort of British Army commando-type force.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk)
13:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, and moved it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
The title of the template is "Alleged Afghan Training Camps" but the template also includes a camp located in Bosnia and camps located in other counties. Should we change the title or should we remove camps that are not located in Afghanistan? IQinn ( talk) 09:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- I suggest to remove the camps that are not located in Afghanistan and will do so in a few days if there is no objection.
IQinn (
talk)
05:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Done. IQinn ( talk) 22:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Why didn't you consider rewriting the intro rather than removing information? Geo Swan ( talk) 00:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
There were two discussions in March 2010, over when navigation templates should be collapsed.
User:Iqinn had been inserting explicit "state=autocollapse" on every instance they found, of certain navigation templates.
They were inserting these explicit "state=autocollapse" with no explanation whatsoever.
In the March 2010 discussion Iqinn did offer explanations of sorts, for inserting those "state=autocollapse".
I think it was very clear, from those discussions, that no one accepted Iqinn's perceptions that the navigation templates violated
WP:NPOV as a valid justification for autocollapsing templates. I encouraged Iqinn, many times, in many discussion pages, to address the perception that a navigation template was biased through discussion, on the navigation templates talk place.
I think it was very clear, from those discussions, that while certain wikiprojects have decided through consensus, that their navigation templates should have the property "state=autocollapsed" single individuals should not go and change this property on existing templates. The March discussions concerned over-riding the default state on specific instances. I believe this advice applies to changing the template's default state to autocollapse.
Yet Iqinn has changed the default state of this template to autocollapse, without any explanation whatsoever.
Geo Swan (
talk)
18:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- That is absolutely wrong. I did not recently modify the default state=autocollapse of this template nor at any other template. The editor who put this message up here User:Geo Swan has a long history of disruptive behavior including attacking other editors based on false information. I am going to strike his uncivil disruptive attack post. IQinn ( talk) 22:51, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- I stand corrected. Iqinn did not recently change the template's default state. The record does show they continued to autocollapse templates,without explanation, after the discussion above. Geo Swan ( talk) 13:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- That's wrong again. Geo Swan continues uncivil personal attacks are disruptive. IQinn ( talk) 13:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)