This template is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
I moved this template to the correct location. Please make any new such templates at their correct locations; don't use the talk namespace for templates.
Jdorje06:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)reply
I think the unspoken compromise was to list both the uppercase and the lowercase greek letters for all greek-letter-name storms (at least, that stopped the revert warring). Since then, two anons have removed the uppercase greek letters; should I revert that? Maybe leave a note at the top of the page? --
AySz88^-^18:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Unfortunately, the unspoken compromise left both parties unhappy. It's even worse than having some caps and some non-caps. Oh well. -
Cuivienen15:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)reply
This discussion should be a redirect, because all the season button bars should look the same and have the same usage; the discussion for all of them is equivalent.
Jdorje21:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)reply
I was the one who made the bars for 1995-2003 (and seriously corrected 2004), and I redirected all the talk pages to this one... unless somebody changed that in the past couple of days, I haven't checked.
PenguinCDF19:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Alright, all redirects from old templates to correct templates are (finally) done (1995 and after), and all talk pages for the correct templates lead to this.
PenguinCDF00:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)reply
1995 is a good cutoff date since that's when the NHC moved to its new, more complete, forecasting format. If you guys go back further I don't know when you should stop.
Jdorje22:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)reply
That's why I stopped at 1995. However, I see some people attempted bars for earlier seasons (evident in the
Hurricane Joan-Miriam and
Hurricane Klaus articles), leading me to think we should go to 1979, the first year the 6 year rotation of names was used, and clean up some messes along the way. But I won't do them unless you guys think that's a good idea too.
PenguinCDF19:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)reply
If we do keep going (probably will, since I have nothing else to do tomorrow!), an absolute stopping point would be 1950, the first year of naming storms.
PenguinCDF00:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Perhaps you should add {{clear}} to the top of the button bar start. It seems a common problem that pictures run down onto the bar, causing formatting problems. And I can't think of any time that would be desirable.
Jdorje06:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)reply
I have nothing in particular in mind to ease the transition. Also, the # should be included in the {{storm color}} template, but this would take even more work to fix up. —
jdorje (
talk)
22:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC)reply
These "buttons" are technically
navbox(es), and I think they all need the v • d • e links for easier edit access. For me to get to this template I had to edit an article, copy the code, then type it into search.
StevePrutz (
talk)
16:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Numbers
The numbers used for Pacific typhoon articles aren't very intuitive, which is really the whole purpose for providing links at the bottom. If you don't want to identify the storms by letters, why not lose the whole thing?
Potapych (
talk)
01:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)reply
The numbers used are the offical numbers assigned by JMA - and we cant id the JMA storms by letters as they are too simular see 2008 PTS for an example
Jason Rees (
talk)
03:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)reply