This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Version | CLR | Release date |
Shipped With Visual Studio |
Preinstalled with Windows | Embraces | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Client | Server | |||||
1.0 | 1.0 | February 13, 2002 | .NET 2002 | — | — | — |
1.1 | 1.1 | April 24, 2003 | .NET 2003 | — | 2003 | — |
2.0 | 2.0 | November 7, 2005 | 2005 | — | 2003 R2 | — |
3.0 | 2.0 | November 6, 2006 | — | Vista | 2008 | 2.0 |
3.5 | 2.0 | November 19, 2007 | 2008 | 7 | 2008 R2 | 3.0 |
4.0 | 4 | April 12, 2010 | 2010 | — | — | — |
4.5 | 4 | August 15, 2012 | 2012 | 8 | 2012 | 4.0 |
4.5.1 | 4 | October 17, 2013 | 2013 | 8.1 | 2012 R2 | 4.5 |
4.5.2 | 4 | May 5, 2014 | — | — | — | 4.5.1 |
4.5.3 | 4 | TBA | — | 10 | 2015 | 4.5.2 |
About date format, because .net framework is a product of Microsoft, a North American international corporation. In order to avoiding the confusion, using American Standard Date format to state its precise release date.
This revision is provided for kind and nice editors from all over the world who want to improve the template in the main article. Any critic is welcome, but modifications to it for improving its qualities are much more welcome. But I do anti-"Nazi"!
Janagewen (
talk) 00:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
::: I am so respectful for your reply. But have we ever both chatted on wiki? Why omitted your name here? If you are English-native speaker, then I am sorry. If not, why you use awful to describe my English skill? That takes nonsense, I think I was treated as shit for each my modification on this template has been reverted in minutes without reason. Can I call it discrimination? I was treated in this way like a shit, so no matter my English skill is awful or excellent, does it take sense? The template in main article is obviously a mass, and misleads readers, especially on the description about the relationship among versions and inclusion. That is wrong! I know people passed it by and ignored, or without passion to modify it, but not say that it is correct. Yeah, I apologize for using the words "woodenhead" and "stupid", but these two words are the most suitable for people who ignore my revision and reverted my modification without consideration at all. Guy, if you are interested in this template too, I just wish you devote to making it better rather than arguing some a shit like me.
Janagewen (
talk) 07:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Why should I always give a shit? Janagewen ( talk) 10:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC) Done
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/145e8605-899e-4014-934a-0d1f877410b0/which-table-is-more-reasonable?forum=netfxsetup
The above link might be the only proof worth mentioning here.
Password Saeba Ryo (
talk) 04:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
A good suggestion! I love it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.236.156.206 ( talk) 03:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
I thought I would suggest adding a new column specifying end of support dates based on something like " Microsoft .NET Framework Support Lifecycle Policy FAQ". The reason is that specifies a complex end of support schedule based on different versions having been released differently (either independent product or component of something else like an OS release, etc.). 15.203.233.84 ( talk) 23:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Pro argument: The FAQ does say that the support depends on the underlying OS, but on the same time states that "support will end for .NET Framework 4, 4.5, and 4.5.1 on January 12, 2016.". The support for version 4.5.1 is thus shorter as the one of 8.1 and 2012 R2: 4.5.2 is considered as a fix of previous 4.x version. As of August 2016, 4.5.2 is thus the oldest version still supported and probably therefore the default version in Visual Studio 2015 update3! EDIT: 3.5 is still supported as part of Windows 7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.65.52.7 ( talk) 12:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
The importance of .NET Standard is that it a unifying concept between .NET Core and .NET Standard. This will be clear when .NET Standard 2.0 will be released because it the first version that will be compatible with both of: a version of .NET Framework (v 4.6.1) and a version of .NET Core ( v 2.0) [1] Its release date is Q3 2017. [2] Saying that, I would ask for not reverting [ my edit] of this template that added a column containing .NET Standard read ( talk) 18:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)