The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Comment: I believe that this would be good for Wikipedia's birthday, 15 March. - Many more things could be said: ... that she is still alive, ... that she showed the Aufseherin as a human being, ...
Overall: great article. 5 * expanded. Although most sources are in non-English, there were enough in English to understand. The image explains public domain, acknowledgement made. @
Gerda Arendt:. One citation needed then ok to go.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 06:29, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! - I commented that one sentence out, it's not relevant, just a nicety, translated from German. If I find a ref, I'll bring it back. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 08:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
@
Gerda Arendt:. Thank you. I just notice the married name not cited. I can see it used in reference 9.[
[1]]. Please check list of awards. One award has a citation. Should you be referencing these too? I tried looking and would have sorted for you if I could read the non-English ones.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 11:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I don't recall to have ever cited alternate names. For the awards, I hope for
Poeticbent. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 11:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Done! Her married name and her awards are now supported by inline citations. Thanks, Poeticbenttalk 14:44, 7 March 2018 (UTC)