Overall: Article new and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook seems interesting. QPQ done.
Toadboy123 (
talk) 18:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
@
Spaghettifier,
Toadboy123, and
AirshipJungleman29: I can't call the race for this hook just yet, unfortunately :) it looks like there are a few things we need to fix up. First, there are a couple of unsourced statements in the article, and some statements sourced to really-not-great publications like BuzzFeed and Distractify. Second, the operative text of the hook is taken from BuzzFeed's headline (I'm sure by accident!). Third, the background section is... uncomfortably big. Once it's pared back, I'm not sure if the article would survive a
WP:NOPAGE challenge, but let's resolve those problems first and then a merge discussion is hopefully avoidable.
theleekycauldron (
talk • she/her) 09:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)