The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Improved to Good Article status by
The Herald (
talk). Nominated by
Casliber (
talk) at 01:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC).
Article is new enough as promoted to Ga on 23 May, long enough at 21,715 characters. Article is well sourced and neutral as part of GA process. ALT 1 is my preferred hook and is sourced to three scientific articles. The image is used in the article and looks okay and is tagged as in the public domain, however I would appreciate someone having a log at the warning notice listed on the image to make sure we aren't contravening something. Article is good to go however.
BletheringScot 17:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Image needs a source, period. No source, no image. There are literally dozens of other images we could use (
example), so long as they're sourced. No need to use an image of unclear provenance. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 23:43, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Cas Liber, don't forget to replace it here as well; the old image is still here and it's even more ineligible than before, since it isn't in the article any longer. Thanks.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 04:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Per my original review and the image change this seems good to go. Image is sourced and not subject to copyright and looks ok at small size.
BletheringScot 21:24, 3 July 2015 (UTC)