The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk) 20:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. Nominator is QPQ-exempt. My first thought is that the plot section at 783 words is overly long (our limit is generally 700 words,
WP:VG/CONTENT), particularly in its size relative to the rest of the article, and could be trimmed back. Hook fact does check out. @
Totalibe: This is almost ready to go, but I'd suggest trimming the plot first.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 18:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I had to reduce it somewhat when writing it as it felt overly long, although I was a little unsure of how best to do that, I'll try trimming it some more.
Totalibe (
talk) 21:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Just checked again—plot summary weighs in at 695 words, so this is ready to go. Still a little on the high side, but I'll take it.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 01:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)