The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Article is
neutral, meets the
required length, and is
sufficiently referenced and free of
copyvio. Created within seven days of this nomination. Hooks are interesting, succinct, and referenced; ALT1's phrasing is a bit more concise so that would be my choice.
QPQ looks good. This is good to go! A fascinating topic—thank you for sharing. –
Rhain☔ (
he/him) 01:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
@
Rhain: thanks for the review! This was an interesting page to write.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 07:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I was interested in ALT0 - saw that it is sourced to The Daily Beast which is yellow on
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. I imagine it is ok because it not controversial information.
Bruxton (
talk) 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)