The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
97198 (
talk) 10:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk). Self-nominated at 06:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC).
Hi
Cwmhiraeth, review follows: article just over 5x expanded between 10 and 13 October; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to excellent sources; no overly close paraphrasing spotted form the sources I could access; hooks are both interesting and mentioned to article, AGF on sourcing which I couldn't access; QPQ has been carried out. It has been suggested for Halloween and, depending on what else is available from the approved hooks list, would suit that -
Dumelow (
talk) 13:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, there's no room in the Halloween set for more nature hooks, so I'm returning this to the regular noms list.
Yoninah (
talk) 10:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)