The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 06:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
ALT1:... that regarding her performance in Out of the Dark, RogerEbert.com said 7-year-old Pixie Davies "is cute enough, she understandably doesn't have much range beyond pouting, and smiling"? Source:
[2]
5x expanded by
Pamzeis (
talk). Self-nominated at 05:57, 12 August 2021 (UTC).
Hi
Pamzeis, review follows: more than 5x expansion in text confirmed on 12 August; sources look reliable for the field; I didn't find any overly close paraphrasing from the sources used and the quotes are properly attributed; hooks are OK, mentioned in the article and check out to the cited sources; a QPQ has been carried out; a few queries -
Dumelow (
talk) 07:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Is it worth linking
Breakthrough role in the hook, I must admit I had to look it up
Done
Is it worth mentioning her age in ALT1 to explain why her range was considered short?
Added
That fact that Nativity 2 was her film debut is mentioned in the lead but not in the main text
Added to the main text
You'll need to add citations for the roles in the filmography table that don't have them (you could reuse the ones from the main text)
Added
Thank you for your review,
Dumelow. I have responded to the above.
Pamzeis (
talk) 07:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Pamzeis, looks fine to me -
Dumelow (
talk) 08:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)