The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
4meter4 (
talk) 21:48, 2015 November 20 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk). Nominated by
Oceanh (
talk) at 23:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC).
C&Px5LavaBaron (
talk) 00:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Not a viable review, does not mention image or provide any information of use to a promoter.
— Maile (
talk) 16:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Review by Maile
Well, OK, another one. Let's give this a real review, so the promoter can move it up without questions.
QPQ by Oceanh
Eligibility
Article achieved GA status on October 25, 2015 and has 13785 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
Sourcing
Every paragraph sourced inline, one both online and inline
No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline source
Hook
Hook is 60 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced where stated. I inserted (pictured) into the hook.
Image
PastinakePflanzegeerntet.jpg is in the article, and is an original photo freely licensed on Commons
Tools
I used Earwig's Tool, which showed
"Violation possible", but none of it seems to be any source you've used. I AGF these are sites that got their information from Wikipedia. Therefore....
Duplication Detector, plus spot check, on every online source showed no copyvio/close paraphrasing issues of concern.
This article is Good2Go.
— Maile (
talk) 16:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)