The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by
BlueMoonset (
talk) 02:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Back on track, the AfD finished as no consensus
Bruxton (
talk) 21:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination is back on hold again as an editor has placed a notability template on the article after the AfD conclusion. I will keep watching for any changes.
Bruxton (
talk) 21:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
I've removed the tag, we'll see if it sticks.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (she/her) 21:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
@
Onel5969: I've removed the notability tag, it's not tangibly helpful for the article to have one. If it has survived two AfDs, even on "no consensus", there's no reason for editors to further check and recheck when no new information has come to light. In the meantime, for the readers who come across this article, they shouldn't be made to feel that the article is shaky in that respect.
theleekycauldron (
talk •
contribs) (she/her) 21:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
I went to review this piece, but there are still major issues with the work. I'm inclined to say no to this. --
evrik(
talk) 16:34, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Honestly, I'd like to withdraw this nomination. It's dragged on for over two-months and the article can barely be considered "new". And I don't really have the energy to deal with the remaining issues. Sorry if I wasted anyone's time. Also, please, please, please, don't view this as a "ragequit". I promise it's not that. Or maybe it is. I honestly don't know lol. Whatever happens, just don't view it as a ragequit.
Pamzeis (
talk) 13:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)