The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3talk 13:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
Neither of the hooks have correct inline citations. The article was moved from AfC on 27 December 2013, so it passes for newness. Article passes length and neutrality requirements. Both hooks meet length requirements. QPQ not required as its not technically a self-nom. Chris Troutman (
talk) 07:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
It has been over a week and a half with no action on this nomination's hook issues. Closing as unsuccessful.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 04:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)