The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk) 16:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
QPQ: - Not done Overall: @
Launchballer: Article could be good for DYK, but needs a little work. I could do with "Roddy St. James" being enclosed in commas. Also, is there any way that you could include that this hook fact was according to Healy? Per
D5, I will have to put this on hold as there is a current AfD. Concerns have been raised in the AfD about the article's neutrality: could you tell me if these concerns have been fixed? QPQ is also needed. Schminnte (
talk •
contribs) 17:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Most of the neutrality concerns were made by
aggrieved Redditors unhappy that I've accurately reported what reliable sources have said; once you discount the
WP:SPA votes, there is currently a 7-0 consensus to keep. As for the hook, I feel that attributing it to Healy neuters it somewhat, so instead I suggest the following:
@
Launchballer: it's a compromise, but I'd be happy to approve that as a quirky hook once the AfD boils over. Just be sure to do the QPQ. Schminnte (
talk •
contribs) 07:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Looking at that Reddit post sure is... interesting. I'm happy that none of the articles I've written have attracted the attention of a angry mob dedicated fanbase. Schminnte (
talk •
contribs) 07:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)