The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Orlady (
talk) 21:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
This guy is from my home town, so I have to review! First thing's first, before reviewing, the original is way too long. I like the ALT, but I doubt executions were done by hanging in 1966.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 09:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Article: New enough and long enough. Referencing is very thorough, although some things should be improved before this makes FA (for DYK purposes its fine though). Images are fine. AGF on offline sources. Paraphrasing checked against
this and
this, and no issues are readily apparent.
Summary: Amazing article. AGF on offline sources. Just waiting for feedback about the choice of hooks.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 10:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Let's go for Hook ALT2. —
Cliftonian(talk) 12:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
ALT2 is good to go!
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 13:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)