The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 14:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Renomination. The first nomination (new article) was insufficiently long. This nom follows GA approval. I'm using the same "reviewed" article from the original nomination since it didn't count for the first DYK nom.
interesting hook, verified by source and cited. Well-referenced throughout and GA is recent. QPQ done. No copyvio detected by Earwig, so good to go.
Juxlos (
talk) 01:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)