The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk) 15:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. Cursory look shows no uncited claims. QPQ is done. Overall, everything looks—uh, oh. Earwig is showing a 93% copyvio likelihood based on
IMD? This is probably a false positive assuming the IMDB editor took the info from the wiki page, but I'll need you to get back to me before I properly pass it. Assuming it gets passed, I'd go with any of the given hooks, except ALT5, which isn't too interesting. ALT1 is a bit confusing; did they accept the request, film the alternate ending, then remove it, or did they refuse to make the alternate ending altogether?
Krisgabwoosh (
talk) 20:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
@
Krisgabwoosh: Thanks for the review! This is definitely a case of
WP:MIRROR with IMDb; it's happened before with
otherepisodes too. I've rephrased ALT1; hopefully it makes more sense. Let me know if there's anything else! –
Rhain☔ (
he/him) 23:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Perfect, just making sure. Any of these alts look good to go.
Krisgabwoosh (
talk) 23:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I like ALT4 and I know they are real giraffes or live giraffes because I made the connection to the Calgary Zoo in the article. But perhaps we need to explicitly state it in the article "real giraffes".
Bruxton (
talk) 15:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)