The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Rjjiiitalk 16:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment only I've just run a couple of scripts to fix MOS issues plus removed a stub tag (from a GA!). I'm thus not sure how thorough the GA review was. I encourage reviewers to look more closely than they otherwise would when reviewing GAs for DYK. Schwede66 21:52, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Overall: The first source given is a deprecated source. However the second source given is reliable, as it is an official website. It could be a primary source, but given that the hook is about a certain species of fungi, I'd let it pass.
Brachy08(Talk) 00:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
@
Brachy0008: where is ScienceDirect deprecated? I could only find the discussion regarding their machine-generated "Topics" summaries.
[1]Rjjiii (
talk) 14:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
I checked... only the topic summaries are deprecated. Other stuff about ScienceDirect doesn't show up anywhere else in
WP:RSP. There's a second citation though
Brachy08(Talk) 15:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)