The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk) 08:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this,
Onegreatjoke. I'd completely forgotten that the GA meant the article was eligible for DYK again. I think we could find some more interesting facts about Al-Gailani, though. For example: –
Joe (
talk) 04:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
New enough, long enough. Hook short enough and sourced (as is every paragraph). No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done and image properly licensed.
Assuming good faith on offline references. Good to go.--Launchballer 07:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)