The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Reviewing... New enough, long enough, Earwig's copyvio <1%.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 04:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
... Thank you for this interesting article. It reads well and follows the main refernece closely. QPQ not required. Hook is in article and referenced, but is quite general. Can you think of a more specific hook to her?
Whispyhistory (
talk) 15:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that editions of Josephine Kenyon's book Healthy Babies Are Happy Babies increasingly moved away from their original recommendations of rigid scheduling to "on-demand" scheduling based on the child? Source: Opitz, Donald: 'During the course of the book’s five revisions ... her trend in pediatric advice shifted from an emphasis on following rigid schedules to attending to a child’s “on-demand” schedule.' Possible Alt, 198 characters, suggested by
Mary Mark Ockerbloom (
talk) 21:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you @
Mary Mark Ockerbloom:... I was thinking of a hook along that topic too, but it would be good to shorten and simplify.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 19:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you... looks good. How about a hook containing 'good housekeeping'? There may be something in this reference
p. 102.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 20:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Approving ALT2... I don't think the quote marks are needed as it appears a common term when I searched literature on the topic. Possibly link the book. The hook is in the article and in the main source. Thank you both.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 14:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)