The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
@
Philafrenzy: The article was new enough when nominated, it is long enough, and the hook is cited. But, it seems that QPQ has not been completed, and there is a tiny bit of an issue with closely paraphrasing
this website. Other than that, I would add "scientific" before "articles" in the hook.
RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 15:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you @
RileyBugz:. QPQ done. Done some re-phrasing and "scientific" ok so added.
Whispyhistory (
talk) 16:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
– looks good to go! Nice job on the article, too.
RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 16:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)