The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Dying (
talk) 09:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi
Onegreatjoke (
talk), review follows: article promoted to GA on 7 February; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; almost all of the sources are offline but happy to AGF there are no copyright violations (article writer is a trusted and experienced editor), Earwig check shows nothing of concern; I edited the hooks a little to add some context (year, name of battle etc.), let me know if you are unhappy with my changes; hook facts are stated in the article and cited offline, happy to AGF they are supported by the sources; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me -
Dumelow (
talk) 08:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)