The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Gatoclass (
talk) 14:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Solomon7968 (
talk). Self nominated at 19:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC).
Way too short at just 634ch. Needs to be expanded at least 5 times further. Give me a bell when you've expanded it or if you'd like to withdraw.♦
Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
*Okay will expand it within tommorow from the Russian wikipedia article but the problem is the Russian article has only one reference. Will ping you tommorow.
Solomon7968 13:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
1589 ch of readable prose now, just enough. Article looks OK. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dr. Blofeld (
talk •
contribs) 14:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Showing under 1500 now.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 05:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
It's a handful of bytes under 1500 but is a worthy topic and reasonably well presented so I am promoting this one per IAR.
Gatoclass (
talk) 14:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)