The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 00:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
No response from nominator despite multiple pings
Note: it has been over a month since the review was posted without any response here. Will be pinging the nominator on their talk page and allowing the usual seven days for a response.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Graeme Bartlett, have you added all the necessary sourcing? You really do need to respond here. Thank you.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 15:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
No response here in two months despite multiple pings and specific requests for a response. Marking for closure, though if a response is posted here prior to that, the nomination could continue.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 07:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
I've left Graeme one final talk page message, I will close this in a couple of days or so if they're unable to respond by then.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 23:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)