The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This would automatically meet the DYK criteria if it weren't for the fact that it has been more than a month since this was promoted to GA. That being said, this is only because no one has managed to pick up the nomination until now. I'd like a second opinion on this.
Bneu2013 (
talk) 16:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
By my count it was nominated within 7 days of GA promotion, so that should be fine. —
Mx. Granger (
talk·contribs) 20:46, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Full review needed; article was nominated within seven days of being listed as a GA, and is therefore eligible for DYK.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 03:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
New enough, long enough. Hook short enough and sourced (as is every paragraph). No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done. Good to go.--Launchballer 08:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)