The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Bruxtontalk 20:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Article expansion new enough and long enough. The article is well cited, with no issues or reliability concerns identified in the sourcing used. Both the Alt0 and Alt1 hooks are verified and correct. Alt0 could be reworded to be more compact?--
Kevmin§ 01:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
I think making ALT0 more compact is a good idea. Brevity is where I fall down on a lot of my writing the first time through. Variation on the wording you suggested in the summary Alt2 "...that saving the Guadalupe cypress included the help of 40
Judas goats?"
The condensed version you've provided looks great, nice and succinct. --
Kevmin§ 01:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
References
^Wanderer, Emily Mannix (March 2015). "Biologies of Betrayal: Judas Goats and Sacrificial Mice on the Margins of Mexico". BioSocieties. 10 (1): 1–23.
doi:
10.1057/biosoc.2014.13.
ISSN1745-8552.
^De La Luz, José Luis León; Rebman, Jon P.; Oberbauer, Thomas (2003). "On the urgency of conservation on Guadalupe Island, Mexico: is it a lost paradise?". Biodiversity and Conservation. 12 (5): 1073–1082.
doi:
10.1023/A:1022854211166.
S2CID10038493.