The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cielquiparle (
talk) 16:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Article is
neutral, meets the
required length, and is
sufficiently referenced and free of
copyvio. Converted from a redirect within seven days of this nomination. Hooks are interesting enough, succinct, and referenced—ALT2 would probably be my pick for phrasing, but all are fine. Once
QPQ is done, this will be good to go! –
Rhain☔ (
he/him) 01:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
@
Rhain: Thank you for the review/comments. QPQ is now done.
Soulbust (
talk) 08:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for that! (First time I've seen a circular QPQ before.) This is good to go. –
Rhain☔ (
he/him) 12:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)