The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelidtalk 16:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Chetsford, as the emergency backlog mode is in operation and you have previously nominated more than 20 articles at DYK, you will need to provide an additional QPQ.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 03:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@
Chetsford: Given that the requested date is just under four months away, far beyond the usual six-week limit, you will have to make an IAR request on WT:DYK for the request to be approved. Otherwise, it will have to run as a regular hook.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 14:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 - thank you, I completely forgot about the six week limit! New hook suggested.
Chetsford (
talk) 05:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Starting review.
Zeete (
talk) 18:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
New (created March 11), long enough (over 6,300 per DYK check), cited (some in Czech), neutral, Earwig reported violation unlikely, 5.7%, QPQs done, hook interesting, cited (used Google translate), length checked ok. Thanks,
Zeete (
talk) 19:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)