The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by
Launchballertalk 17:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Overall: Earwig gives a 50%+ chance of violation. Reviewing the results, the paragraph detailing Grutter v. Bollinger could be better paraphrased, as could the one beginning "In 1997, Orfield..." —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 15:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Side note - apparently the nominator is blocked for socking, so this will need to be handled by someone else, or failed. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 15:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
With the nominator blocked, and no one stepping forward to adopt this nomination, I am marking this as rejected.
Z1720 (
talk) 15:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)