The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by
Schwede66 (
talk) 06:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
@
Epifanove: Sorry but this article doesn't look like it was expanded five times. The bytes have been expanded by five times but what Dyk looks for is a 5x expansion of prose which the article doesn't seem to meet. Sorry.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 19:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
@
Epifanove: There's still an option you could use to get this at DYK: nominate it for
good article, and if it passes, then it qualifies.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 19:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)