The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Sven ManguardWha? 03:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Article new enough, long enough, fully referenced. Hook fine, interesting, verified against online source. NASA image on Commons so PD. Looks weird at any size. No QPQ required. Good to go!
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 21:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
The wording on this one doesn't seem to flow right. What do you thing of
I have added a space to ALT2, but both are fine by me. ALT1 is slightly more compact.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 08:34, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
It took me a while to figure out why you thought that it didn't "flow right". I think your problem was the repetition of "from". Prefer ALR2 for this reason. I think the ALTs should refer tothe Elephant Moraine as the original does.
Hawkeye7 (
talk) 19:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
So that would be ::ALT3 ... that the meteorite EETA 79001(pictured), recovered from the
Elephant Moraine, was found to have come from Mars?
I am happy with that too, sounding better than alt2.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 20:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Re-marking this so it gets noticed. ALT3 is the consensus pick, and since all of the alts are just re-wordings of the same fact, Hawkeye7's check stands.
Sven ManguardWha? 08:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)