The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
notwithstanding the QPQ which has yet to be done, the hook fact has to be directly cited per DYK rules. Cheers
Kingoflettuce (
talk) 08:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Please see middle para of career section, thanks.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 09:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing @
Kingoflettuce:. QPQ done, and added inline citation.
[1]The Roll is of course a book of reference 711 pages long, not a book to be read. It is even more clearly a monument to Crawford's accurate industry than was the Histoty. The careers of 6,156men
OK, good to go now,AGF on offline sources Yes, not on my reading list :)
Kingoflettuce (
talk) 10:43, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Addendum: New enough, long enough, interesting hook, no copyvio (as far as can be told given the offline sources), neutrally written.
Kingoflettuce (
talk) 10:44, 27 May 2018 (UTC)