The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 09:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. No POV detected. Is very well sourced. No copyvio detected. Hook is good in length, is interesting, is inline-cited within the article, and is neutral. QPQ complete. This one is ready and deserving of mainspace exposure.
78.26 (
I'm no IP, talk to me!) 18:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)