The article was recently recreated from a redirect so if tools say this is an old article then that is inaccurate. Thus the article is technically eligible. There are however multiple major issues with the nomination right now. The first is that the article is in need of a copyedit, and second, the hook is too vague and broad to meet
WP:DYKINT. It lacks context (it doesn't make it unambiguously clear that the subject is a song), and the "#1 on the popularity charts" claim also lacks context. I should also note that the article isn't more specific about which charts are being referred to here either, so that is also an issue with the article.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 08:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't have any information about those popularity charts.
KunalAggarwal95 (
talk) 10:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
If that's the case then that hook can't run as it won't pass scrutiny on either WT:DYK or WP:ERRORS. A new hook will need to be proposed here, but if one can't, then the nom will be marked for closure.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 23:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
The context of that hook is a bit unclear. Did you mean the song was covered by Kumar and Rafi with the help of AI? Given this is a music-related hook, maybe
Launchballer can come up with a clearer and more grammatically-correct wording.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 12:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
If the hook is telling me what I think it's trying to tell me, then I would suggest words to the effect of ALT1a: ... that an
AI-generated cover of
Shaan and
Kailash Kher's "Chand Sifarish" became popular on social media? Also, what makes
The Times of India reliable?--Launchballer 13:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Just noting that the tools are saying this is an old article because it used to be one; the article was deleted at AfD in 2012. I think the AI stuff takes it over the line in terms of notability.--Launchballer 13:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I understand that ToI has a yellow rating at
WP:RSP, but the hook's claim seems uncontroversial and not something they likely made up. If there are no other sources that cover that information I don't think it should be an issue to use ToI in this particular case (unless this is one of their paid articles), but to be on the safe side maybe another source should be added to strengthen the claim.
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk ·
contributions) 13:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)