The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that after a failed
Roman assault at the Battle of New Carthage, the romans launched a second assault in the afternoon, surprising the
Carthaginian army? Source: Goldsworthy, Adrian (2004) [2003]. In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire. London: Phoenix. ISBN 978-0-7538-1789-6. Page 62-63 , Goldsworthy, Adrian (2006) [2000]. The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265–146 BC. London: Phoenix. ISBN 978-0-304-36642-2. Page 274 , Lowe, Benedict J (2000). "Polybius 10.10.12 and the Existence of Salt-Flats at Carthago Nova". Phoenix. Classical Association of Canada. 54 (1/2 (Spring - Summer)): 39–52. doi:10.2307/1089089. JSTOR 1089089. page 42
ALT1: ... that the martial booty seized by the
Romans after the Battle of New Carthage, containing 63 merchant ships, numerous catapults, large amounts of weapons, and more, has been described as "colossal"? Source: Hoyos, Dexter (2003). Hannibal's Dynasty: Power and Politics in the Western Mediterranean, 247–183 BC. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-41782-9. Page 144 , Bagnall, Nigel (1999). The Punic Wars: Rome, Carthage and the Struggle for the Mediterranean. London: Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-6608-4. Page 209
I would prefer the second element rather than the former. J H Richardson CQ 68 (2018) 458ff raises pretty reasonable doubts – largely about physical impossibility – as to why we shouldn't entirely believe the ancient stories of the city's capture.
Ifly6 (
talk) 19:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Just in case there is trouble regarding this down the road, can I note that I was unaware of this article's nomination for DYK until just now, three days after the event.
Gog the Mild (
talk) 16:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
ALT1 is a good hook but perhaps a little long (199 characters): how about cutting to "... that the martial booty seized by the
Romans after the Battle of New Carthage included 63 merchant ships, numerous catapults, large amounts of weapons and more?"
UndercoverClassicist (
talk) 18:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
(Labeling the above as ALT1b)
Edge3 (
talk) 01:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Approve ALT1b, may accept ALT1. Article was nominated within 7 days of achieving GA. Clearly long enough. Neutral and well-cited. All sources offline, accepted in good faith. Earwig only flagged the titles of sources, so no copyvio detected. QPQ done. I note that the article is currently at FAC.
All proposed hooks are sourced to offline sources. ALT0 is questioned (see comment by
Ifly6 above and also on
article's talk page). ALT1 is compliant with the rules (just barely below the character limit), but I much prefer and approve
UndercoverClassicist's shorter version ALT1b.
Edge3 (
talk) 01:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)