The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New enough, long enough, QPQ done, passes earwig. --
evrik(
talk) 17:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
evrik, will you be finishing this review at some point? I note that you haven't addressed the neutrality and sourcing criteria, the image, nor the hook being adequately supported. Once you've done all this, if it meets the DYK criteria, then the appropriate icon must be added (and if it doesn't, then an icon is still needed to signal that the review is complete). Thank you.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
New enough, long enough, QPQ done, passes earwig. Article is neutral and sourced. Hook is sourced. --
evrik(
talk) 03:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)