The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Lightbursttalk 16:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
New enough and long enough (although could be expanded some more). All paragraphs referenced (AGF on the references to the offline book; since the hook is not sourced to the offline references I can give this a green check rather than grey). The hook is interesting and is referenced. I did not find any instances of copying or close paraphrasing. The only issue is that QPQ has not yet been done.
Rlendog (
talk) 22:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It appears that this is the nominator's 5th nom, so no QPQ required yet (although the next nomination will require one).
Rlendog (
talk) 23:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)