The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 06:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Created by
Hildabast (
talk). Self-nominated at 22:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC).
Checked for absence of copyright violation. Article is new and big enough. Correct person credited. Article is cited throughout and neutrally written. One anachronistic euphemism does not disqualify the DYK. Hook below (alt1) is cited and sounds to be confirmed by newspapers, although I will give an AGF as the page does not open with enough resolution to read the detail. The image is public domain (confirmed on flickr too) and used and looks OK.I would prefer that hooks do not have uncertain facts in them. So how about leaving out the "may have been" bit.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 07:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
alt1 * ... that
Krebiozen, an expensive cancer treatment scam, was unmasked in 1963 by chemist Alma Levant Hayden?
Placing the ? so Hildabast and someone else can support alt1. Otherwise this is good to go.
Graeme Bartlett (
talk) 07:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks - yes from me.
Hildabast (
talk) 11:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
* I've also done a QPQ review and added it to the template, but it doesn't appear to be showing - can't figure out why (sorry).
Hildabast (
talk) 15:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)