The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
3. Every source is reliable and approved by the project.
4. It is presentable.
5. Hook is presented with a reliable source.
6. ALT 2 seems more interesting than the other ones since it involves his creation and portrayal. The other ones seems to be interpretations of third party sources.
7. The two non-free images are given sources.
8. The user has less than 5 DYK nominations found.
9. There are no issues.
Good work.
Tintor2 (
talk) 16:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Tintor2: If this hook is approved, please post the green tick below, using this code: {{subst:DYKyes}}. If not, please add the question mark below, using this code: {{subst:DYK?}}. Thanks,
Z1720 (
talk) 16:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
The only issue I see is the hook. ALT 2 is the only written from a creator's pespective rather than third party source which will interest more people.
Tintor2 (
talk) 18:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
@
Greenish Pickle!: Pinging just in case. Sorry for the delay. It's been since I reviewed a DYK nomination. I think I already suggested ALT 2 in discord.
Tintor2 (
talk) 20:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Tintor2 Hey, I mean Alt 2 is fine. I don't have anything to do here actually. If you think Alt 2 is fine then you can replace it now with green tick like the user said above. Thanks. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 22:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)