The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 05:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
5x expanded by
Athomeinkobe (
talk). Self-nominated at 07:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC).
There are a number of unsourced statements in the article. Please cite them first.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 07:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
@
Athomeinkobe: Citations have been added but the article still lacks citations in some statements. If these aren't cited in three days I will have to fail this one, sadly.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 08:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
You have to appreciate that some of this dated information is not easy to come across online. Is there anything in particular that you feel is controversial and should be verified? As far as I can see all election results are now covered.
AtHomeIn神戸 (
talk) 09:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
As much as I would want to pass this at the moment even without everything being sourced, the article's a BLP so there's not much I can do but to say that the rest needs sourcing. The mentions of her committees can probably be cited to somewhere, for example.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 10:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
@
Narutolovehinata5:, I'm pretty sure that every sentence is now sourced. Please let me know if I've missed anything.
AtHomeIn神戸 (
talk) 07:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Everything is now sourced so . I prefer ALT1 to be promoted, as it seems to be more interesting.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 12:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)